Major accidents involving hazardous substances (Seveso)

A major accident involving hazardous substances, according to the Seveso Directive, is an event such as a release, fire, or major explosion resulting from an uncontrolled process during the operation of an establishment where hazardous substances are present, posing a serious, immediate or delayed danger to human health, property, or the environment, inside or outside the establishment. The term originates from the 1976 accident in the Italian town of Seveso, which led to the first European directive on the subject. The current regulation is Directive 2012/18/EU (Seveso III), transposed into Spanish law by Royal Decree 840/2015 of September 21, which approves measures for controlling the risks inherent in major accidents involving hazardous substances. This regulation applies to establishments where the hazardous substances listed in Annex I are present in quantities equal to or exceeding the established thresholds. It distinguishes between lower-level and higher-level establishments based on these quantities and requires operators to submit notification to the competent authority, a major accident prevention policy, a safety management system, an internal emergency plan, and, for higher-level establishments, a safety report and periodic public information, in addition to undergoing scheduled inspections. From an occupational risk prevention perspective, Seveso process safety is integrated with risk assessment, emergency measures, and the coordination of activities stipulated in Law 31/1995.

In short

A major incident (emission, fire, or explosion) resulting from an uncontrolled process in an establishment handling hazardous substances, posing a serious risk to health, property, or the environment. Directive 2012/18/EU (Seveso III), transposed by Royal Decree 840/2015, applies to establishments that meet or exceed the thresholds in Annex I. It distinguishes between lower and upper levels and requires notification, a prevention policy, a safety management system, an internal emergency plan, and, at the upper level, a safety report, an external emergency plan, and public information, along with scheduled inspections. It is integrated with the risk assessment, emergency measures, and coordination mechanisms established in Law 31/1995.

Content
  1. Scope and levels
  2. Obligations of the industrialist
  3. Relationship with occupational risk prevention
  4. Organizational application: how to manage a Seveso establishment
  5. Limits and common mistakes
  6. Practical example
  7. Regulatory and reference framework
  8. Related concepts
  9. References

A–Z dictionary →

Scope and levels

Royal Decree 840/2015 applies to establishments, defined as the entire area under the control of an industrial operator where hazardous substances are present in one or more facilities, or where such substances are present or may be generated in quantities equal to or greater than the thresholds in Annex I, which lists both hazard categories according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP) and designated substances. Excluded, among others, are military establishments, radiological hazards, transport outside establishments, and mining extraction activities, except for the exceptions provided for in the regulation.

Lower-level establishments are those where the quantities present equal or exceed the thresholds in column 2 of Annex I without reaching those in column 3; higher-level establishments are those where the thresholds in column 3 are reached or exceeded. The classification determines the scope of obligations: higher-level establishments must prepare a safety report, have an external emergency plan approved by the authority and provide information to the public on a regular basis, in addition to being subject to inspections more frequently.

Obligations of the industrialist

  • Notification. Communication to the competent authority of the autonomous community of the data of the establishment, the hazardous substances, their quantities and the environment, within the established deadlines and in the event of any significant change.
  • Major accident prevention policy. A written document that guarantees a high level of protection, with objectives and principles of action and its application through a safety management system proportionate to the risks.
  • Safety management system. Organization and personnel, identification and assessment of major accident risks, operational control, management of modifications, emergency planning, monitoring of objectives, and auditing and review.
  • Safety report. For higher-level establishments, a document that demonstrates the application of the policy and management system, identifies serious accident scenarios and prevention and mitigation measures, and provides the information necessary for territorial and emergency planning; it is reviewed at least every five years.
  • Internal emergency plan. Self-protection plan with the measures to be taken inside the establishment, prepared in consultation with the staff, including subcontractors, and which serves as the basis for the external emergency plan prepared by the authority.
  • Public information and domino effect. Ongoing information on safety measures and procedures in case of an accident, and cooperation with neighboring establishments when there is a possibility of a domino effect.
  • Accident reporting. Immediate notification to the authorities of serious accidents, including their circumstances, substances involved, consequences, and measures taken.

Relationship with occupational risk prevention

  • Risk assessment. Serious accident scenarios are integrated into the occupational risk assessment required by Law 31/1995, along with the assessment of chemical agents and explosive atmospheres .
  • Emergency measures. The internal emergency plan develops article 20 of Law 31/1995 and is coordinated with the Basic Self-Protection Standard (Royal Decree 393/2007) and with civil protection planning (Law 17/2015 and Royal Decree 1196/2003).
  • Consultation and participation. The internal emergency plan is consulted with staff and their representatives, and the prevention policy is communicated to the workforce and contracting companies.
  • Coordination of activities. Contracting companies involved in the establishment receive information and instructions on the risks of serious accidents and emergency measures, in accordance with Article 24 of Law 31/1995.
  • Training. Staff receive specific training on the scenarios, safety barriers and their actions in emergencies.
  • Inspections. The authority inspects establishments according to a plan, annually for those of a higher level and every three years for those of a lower level, except for criteria of systematic risk assessment.

Organizational application: how to manage a Seveso establishment

  1. Inventory the hazardous substances present or that may be generated, classify them according to the CLP Regulation and compare them with the thresholds in Annex I to determine if the establishment is affected and at what level.
  2. Submit the notification to the competent authority and keep it updated in the event of changes in substances, quantities, processes or environment.
  3. Define the policy for the prevention of major accidents and implement the safety management system with responsibilities, operating procedures, change management, maintenance of critical barriers and incident investigation.
  4. Identify and assess serious accident scenarios using appropriate techniques ( HAZOP , fault and event trees, bow-tie, quantitative analysis where appropriate) and document prevention and mitigation barriers.
  5. Prepare the safety report for higher-level establishments and the internal emergency plan for all, in consultation with staff and coordination with the authority for the external emergency plan.
  6. Inform and train staff and contracting companies, inform the public where appropriate, and cooperate with neighboring establishments to prevent a domino effect.
  7. Conduct drills, audits and periodic system reviews, attend inspections by the authority and immediately report any serious accident.

Preventive management software allows you to maintain the inventory of substances and their classification, link serious accident scenarios with risk assessment and barriers, manage maintenance and inspection tasks of critical barriers, plan drills and training, and maintain the documentary traceability required for inspections.

Limits and common mistakes

  1. Failure to review the inventory and classification of substances after process changes, which alters the establishment’s level without notification.
  2. Treat the safety report and emergency plan as administrative documents, with no connection to daily operations or barrier maintenance.
  3. Do not integrate serious accident scenarios into the occupational risk assessment or the coordination with contractors.
  4. Conducting drills without evaluating the results or updating the internal emergency plan.
  5. Ignoring the domino effect with neighboring establishments and the required public information.
  6. Failing to investigate incidents and near misses that demonstrate the degradation of barriers.

The specific application depends on the substances, quantities, and regional regulations for implementation; this information sheet is for informational purposes only.

Practical example

Situation: A company that manufactures cleaning products expands its storage of hypochlorite and a flammable solvent and must check if it is affected by the Seveso Regulation.

  • Inventory. The prevention service and the production manager would inventory the substances, classify them according to the CLP Regulation and apply the sum rule of Annex I, concluding that the establishment becomes a lower level.
  • Obligations. The notification is submitted to the autonomous community, the policy for the prevention of serious accidents is approved, and a safety management system integrated into the existing OSH management system is implemented.
  • Scenarios and emergencies. Leakage and fire scenarios in the warehouse are identified, barriers (containment basins, detection, automatic extinguishing, unloading procedures) are documented, and the internal emergency plan is prepared in consultation with worker safety representatives and in coordination with the carrier and maintenance companies.
  • Monitoring. Annual drills are planned, critical barriers are maintained, and inventory is reviewed after each change, and the first inspection by the authority confirms compliance.

Regulatory and reference framework

The autonomous communities are the competent authorities for notification, evaluation of the safety report, the external emergency plan and inspections, and may establish implementing regulations.

Related concepts

References

  1. Official State Gazette. Royal Decree 840/2015, of September 21, approving measures for the control of risks inherent in major accidents involving hazardous substances. 2015, current consolidated text. Official source
  2. European Union. Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances. 2012. Official source
  3. Official State Gazette. Royal Decree 1196/2003, of September 19, approving the Basic Civil Protection Guideline for the control and planning of major accidents involving hazardous substances. 2003, current consolidated text. Official source
  4. Official State Gazette. Law 17/2015, of July 9, on the National Civil Protection System. 2015, current consolidated text. Official source
  5. European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. 2008. Official source
  6. Official State Gazette. Law 31/1995, of November 8, on Occupational Risk Prevention. 1995, current consolidated text. Official source
  7. Official State Gazette. Royal Decree 393/2007, of March 23, approving the Basic Self-Protection Standard. 2007, current consolidated text. Official source

Editorial information

Publication date: August 30, 2026 .

Editorial Manager: Sabentis Editorial Team .

Editorial review by Pablo Rodríguez LinkedIn

Executive Vice President of the ORP International Foundation and Chief Financial Officer of Sabentis.

Request a Demo

Discover all that Sabentis can do for your organization.

Try Sabentis

request a demo
stars 5
GetApp Software Advice Capterra